|
|
It is with Fig. 35 (transition of the number of access contents), the page view (page view), i.e., perused number of contents, of the all page sum total in a site.
[Fig. 35]
Transition of the number of access contents
Table 1
(i) and the (number of access contents) of a (main index statistical table) should show. :
NPJ: As opposed to 413 page
APJ: 598 page (1.45 fold of before-application of  ,
moreover
NPE: As opposed to 98 page
APE: 133 page (1.36 fold of before-application of
The remarkable effect showed up.
Even if it divides by the number of visitors and sees with the number of access contents per one person, it is with Fig. 36 (transition of the number of access contents / person).
[Fig. 36]
Transition of the number of access contents / person
Table 1
(j) and (the number of access contents / person) of a (main index statistical table) needs to show. :
NPJ: As opposed to a 1.63 page/person;
APJ: 2.35 page/person (1.44 fold of before-application of ;
Again;
NPE: As opposed to a 1.58 page/person;
APE: 1.85 page/person (1.17 fold of before-application of ;
The remarkable effect showed up.
Thus, since both the numbers of access contents increase per one person with the rate of a top page display, the degree of satisfaction by the side of a site improves.
On the other hand, does the degree of satisfaction by the side of a visitor improve?
When a top page is displayed by addition display, if noisy, a visitor will look at a top page, or does it merely close by using?
Then, a visitor's action is analyzed from two angles.
|
|
